Market Musings 19/3/2012
Now that I’ve returned from my travels, this is the first of what’s likely to be three catch-up blogs. In this one I’m going to review the main developments over the past week across the universe of stocks I follow, in the second one I’ll examine the key ‘Chinese takeaways’ from my trip and in the third I hope to catch up on what my peers in the Blogosophere and the media have been saying recently.
(Disclaimer: I am a shareholder in Trinity Mirror plc) In the media sector, Trinity Mirror issued FY2011 results. Going into them I had forecast revenues of £731.0m, EBIT of £99.6m and net debt of £195.8m. In the event, these came in at £746.6m, £92.4m (the main variance here was that exceptional items were c. £5m worse than expected) and £200.7m respectively. One thing that did catch me offside was the pension deficit – this widened to £230m from £161m in FY2010. This is a very material move – the deterioration is the equivalent of 27 pence per share, which compares with Trinity Mirror’s current share price (at the time of writing) of 36.5p. Updating my DCF based valuation model produces an equity value of just 13p per share, which represents 63% downside from current levels. However, this valuation is extremely sensitive to movements in the pension deficit – a 10% move in the pension deficit moves the price target by 9p. I would also note: (i) the strong asset backing (freehold property had a book value of 72p/share in 2010); (ii) the further self-help moves the group could implement on the cost side; and (iii) the reasonably strong cash flows (operating cashflow was £76m last year), which give me confidence that the group can nuke its net debt over the coming 3-4 years. Overall, for me Trinity Mirror is downgraded to a hold.
(Disclaimer: I am a shareholder in Total Produce plc) In the food sector, Aryzta posted its H1 results. There wasn’t a whole lot in it for me, with management saying: “our EPS guidance of 338 cent for FY12 and 400+ cent for FY13 remains unchanged”. Elsewhere, Total Produce announced this morning that it is to be included in the ISEQ 20 indices, which may prompt some modest index buying.
(Disclaimer: I am a shareholder in Playtech plc) In the technology sector, there were reports that Playtech and William Hill are to open talks on their WHO joint venture shortly. From my perspective, the best option for both parties is for William Hill to buy Playtech out (given the difficult working relationship, William Hill’s online needs, Playtech’s balance sheet being significantly strengthened at a time when it’s looking to do deals etc.), a theme explored by IC here. Playtech also issued FY2011 results, which revealed a strong performance (revenues +46%, gross income +41%), while net cash was a healthy €137.3m. Management also signaled that the group has made a strong start to 2012, and that the company has made progress towards achieving a full listing. Playtech’s share price has surged in the past week, tipping 350p and bringing it closer to my breakeven level (~380p). I remain an ‘unhappy holder’ of Playtech but will be ‘less unhappy’ if I can get out of the position flat or slightly up.
In the energy space, Tullow’s FY2011 results contained few surprises, save for a big ramp up in the dividend (from 6p to 12p). That said, the implied yield is only ~1%, so hardly anything to get excited about.
In the recruitment sector, CPL Resources acquired a Swedish firm, ERHAB. While no details of the consideration paid were released, I would expect it to have been very modest – high six figure / low seven figure territory – given CPL’s past form and its understanding that when you buy a recruitment firm you buy a business whose assets walk out the door at 5pm every evening. Hence, this is likely to be about buying a small number of individuals and then investing in building a strong team around them to increase ERHAB’s share of the market. It’s a model that has worked well for CPL both at home (CPL is the largest recruitment firm in Ireland, and has successfully evolved from being a niche IT recruitment specialist – e.g. CPL = ‘Computer Placement Limited’ – into a diversified operator) and abroad (CPL generated 33% of its permanent fees outside of Ireland in FY2011).
Finally, Siteserv has agreed to be sold to a vehicle owned by businessman Mr. Denis O’Brien. Under the terms of the proposed deal, shareholders will receive approximately 3.92c / share. I find this a little surprising given that the scale of Siteserv’s debts might have been expected to result in no consideration going to equity holders. However, IBRC (the former Anglo Irish Bank) seems happy with this arrangement. Overall, it seems the ISEQ is going to lose yet another company.